Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Researchers' Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century
Daniele Fanelli et al.
PLOS ONE (2016)
Towards field-adjusted production: Estimating research productivity from a zero-truncated distribution
Timo Koski et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2016)
How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact
Vincent Lariviere et al.
PLOS ONE (2016)
The European research elite: a cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries
Marek Kwiek
HIGHER EDUCATION (2016)
The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics
Diana Hicks et al.
NATURE (2015)
Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce
John P. A. Ioannidis et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones?
Giovanni Abramo et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2014)
Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact
Brian Uzzi et al.
SCIENCE (2013)
Are academics who publish more also more cited? Individual determinants of publication and citation records
Clement Bosquet et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2013)
Author disambiguation using multi-aspect similarity indicators
Thomas Gurney et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2012)
The application of characteristic scores and scales to the evaluation and ranking of scientific journals
Wolfgang Glaenzel
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE (2011)
Subject clustering analysis based on ISI category classification
Lin Zhang et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2010)
The field factor: towards a metric for academic institutions
Ulf Sandstrom et al.
RESEARCH EVALUATION (2009)
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
JE Hirsch
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2005)
Explaining Australia's increased share of ISI publications - the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts
L Butler
RESEARCH POLICY (2003)
Share Paper
