4.6 Article

What Is the Value of Surgical Intervention for Sacral Metastases?

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168313

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To investigate the impact of surgery on local control and quality of life for patients with sacral metastases and to determine whether the complications of surgery were acceptable. Methods Curettage for metastatic lesions of the sacrum was performed in 154 patients with obvious sacral nerve compression symptoms between July 1997 and July 2014. Potential risk factors were evaluated in univariate analysis for associations with local control; multivariate conditional logistic regression was used to identify the combined effects. Complications were recorded. The pre-and postoperative visual analogue scale of pain, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores, and quality of life scores were collected to evaluate the impact of surgery. Results The cumulative survival rates were 71.8%, 41.1%, and 22.5% and the local control rates were 95.4%, 90.9%, and 79.4% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Tumors with rapid growth, the lack of preoperative radiotherapy, and application of aortic balloon occlusion were significantly associated with good local control. There were 29 (18.8%) complications related to surgery. The mean pain scores were 7.04 preoperatively, 1.66 at 1 month postoperatively (p = 0.003), and 1.51 at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.002). The mean ECOG scores were 2.82 preoperatively and 1.47 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). There were significant improvements from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively in global health status (43.3 vs. 52.1), pain (62.0 vs. 33.2), and constipation (51.4 vs. 30.3) (p< 0.001). Conclusions Surgery for sacral metastasis is effective to palliate pain rapidly and improve constipation and quality of life and has a low rate of complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available