4.8 Article

The role of capsule stiffness on cellular processing

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 3505-3514

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5sc00416k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology [CE140100036]
  2. Australian Research Council [FL120100030, FT110100411, DP1094147, DP130101846, FS110200025, DE130100488]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Particle stiffness is emerging as an important parameter in determining the cell uptake dynamics of particles. Understanding the effects of capsule stiffness on their biological behavior is essential for the development of polymer capsules as therapeutic carriers. Herein, we report the preparation of polysaccharide capsules via atom transfer radical polymerization-mediated continuous assembly of polymers (CAP(ATRP)) on silica templates using methacrylated hyaluronic acid (HA) as the macrocrosslinker. This approach affords HA capsules with controllable wall thickness and tunable stiffness. The influence of capsule stiffness on cellular interaction and intracellular distribution is systematically investigated using flow cytometry, imaging flow cytometry, and deconvolution microscopy. The softest HA capsules with a stiffness (gamma) of 7.5 mN m(-1) possess higher cell surface binding and cellular association when compared to stiffer capsules with gamma of 17.6-28.9 mN m(-1). Furthermore, the uptake of HA capsules is a stiffness-dependent process, with slower and less cellular internalization observed with increasing capsule stiffness. Nevertheless, regardless of the stiffness, all internalized capsules are deformed and located in the lysosomes. These findings offer insights into the influence of capsule stiffness on cellular interaction as well as intracellular fate, providing information for the design of rational polymer capsules for biomedical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available