4.6 Review

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Review Medicine, General & Internal

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement

Jamie J. Kirkham et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2016)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research

Sean R. Tunis et al.

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH (2016)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review

Elizabeth Gargon et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2015)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research

Paul Glasziou et al.

LANCET (2014)

Editorial Material Medicine, Research & Experimental

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider

Paula R. Williamson et al.

TRIALS (2012)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Report From the Institute of Medicine

Harold C. Sox et al.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2009)