Journal
PLOS ONE
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -Publisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159276
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Institutes of Health (NIH NIA) [1R01AG04101]
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)
- Harvard Stem Cell Institute
- Robert and Janice McNair Foundation
- Diabetes Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The beta-cell mitogenic effects of ANGPTL8 have been subjected to substantial debate. The original findings suggested that ANGPTL8 overexpression in mice induced a 17-fold increase in beta-cell proliferation. Subsequent studies in mice contested this claim, but a more recent report in rats supported the original observations. These conflicting results might be explained by variable ANGPTL8 expression and differing methods of beta-cell quantification. To resolve the controversy, three independent labs collaborated on a blinded study to test the effects of ANGPTL8 upon beta-cell proliferation. Recombinant human betatrophin (hBT) fused to maltose binding protein (MBP) was delivered to mice by intravenous injection. The results demonstrate that ANGPTL8 does not stimulate significant beta-cell proliferation. Each lab employed different methods for beta-cell identification, resulting in variable quantification of beta-cell proliferation and suggests a need for standardizing practices for beta-cell quantification. We also observed a new action of ANGPTL8 in stimulating CD45(+) hematopoietic-derived cell proliferation which may explain, in part, published discrepancies. Overall, the hypothesis that ANGPTL8 induces dramatic and specific beta-cell proliferation can no longer be supported. However, while ANGPTL8 does not stimulate robust beta-cell proliferation, the original experimental model using drug-induced (S961) insulin resistance was validated in subsequent studies, and thus still represents a robust system for studying signals that are either necessary or sufficient for beta-cell expansion. As an added note, we would like to commend collaborative group efforts, with repetition of results and procedures in multiple laboratories, as an effective method to resolve discrepancies in the literature.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available