4.6 Article

Genome-Wide Assessment of Efficiency and Specificity in CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Multiple Site Targeting in Arabidopsis

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162169

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  2. Virginia Tech
  3. Pew Latin American Fellows Program in the Biomedical Sciences [00026198]
  4. National Science Foundation-Division of Integrated Organismal Systems [IOS-1455607]
  5. Howard Hughes Medical Institute - HHMI
  6. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF3030]
  7. UNC
  8. Howard HughesMedical Institute
  9. Gordon and BettyMoore Foundation [GBMF3030]
  10. NSF-IOS [IOS-1455607]
  11. HHMI
  12. Direct For Biological Sciences
  13. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1257373] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  14. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  15. Direct For Biological Sciences [1455607] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simultaneous multiplex mutation of large gene families using Cas9 has the potential to revolutionize agriculture and plant sciences. The targeting of multiple genomic sites at once raises concerns about the efficiency and specificity in targeting. The model Arabidopsis thaliana is widely used in basic plant research. Previous work has suggested that the Cas9 off-target rate in Arabidopsis is undetectable. Here we use deep sequencing on pooled plants simultaneously targeting 14 distinct genomic loci to demonstrate thatmultiplex targeting in Arabidopsis is highly specific to on-target sites with no detectable off-target events. In addition, chromosomal translocations are extremely rare. The high specificity of Cas9 in Arabidopsis makes this a reliable method for cleanmutant generation with no need to enhance specificity or adopt alternate Cas9 variants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available