4.6 Article

Cerebrospinal Fluid Inflammatory Biomarkers Reflect Clinical Severity in Huntington's Disease

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163479

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CHDI Foundation
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. European Research Council
  5. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  6. Wolfson Foundation
  7. GlaxoSmithKline foundation
  8. National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
  9. UCL Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neurology Centre
  10. Knut ooch Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  11. MRC [MR/M008592/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Medical Research Council [MR/P007015/1, MR/M008592/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Wellcome Trust [200181/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Immune system activation is involved in Huntington's disease (HD) pathogenesis and biomarkers for this process could be relevant to study the disease and characterise the therapeutic response to specific interventions. We aimed to study inflammatory cytokines and microglial markers in the CSF of HD patients. Methods CSF TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, YKL-40, chitotriosidase, total tau and neurofilament light chain (NFL) from 23 mutation carriers and 14 healthy controls were assayed. Results CSF TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta were below the limit of detection. Mutation carriers had higher YKL-40 (p = 0.003), chitotriosidase (p = 0.015) and IL-6 (p = 0.041) than controls. YKL-40 significantly correlated with disease stage (p = 0.007), UHDRS total functional capacity score (r = -0.46, p = 0.016), and UHDRS total motor score (r = 0.59, p = 4.5*10(-4)) after adjustment for age. Conclusion YKL-40 levels in CSF may, after further study, come to have a role as biomarkers for some aspects of HD. Further investigation is needed to support our exploratory findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available