4.6 Article

Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of a Web-Based Intervention to Promote Healthy Eating, Physical Activity and Meaningful Social Connections Compared with Usual Care Control in People of Retirement Age Recruited from Workplaces

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159703

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Lifelong Health and Wellbeing (LLHW) Cross-Council research initiative
  2. UK Health Departments
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  4. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  5. Medical Research Council (MRC)
  6. Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates
  7. National Institute for Health Research/The Department of Health
  8. Health and Social Care Research & Development of the Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland)
  9. Wales Office of Research and Development for Health and Social Care, Welsh Assembly Government [G0900686]
  10. MRC
  11. BBSRC
  12. Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, a UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Public Health Research Centre of Excellence
  13. British Heart Foundation
  14. Cancer Research UK
  15. ESRC
  16. National Institute for Health Research under the UKCRC
  17. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) and Unit (BRU) based at Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Newcastle University
  18. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  19. Medical Research Council [MR/K023187/1, G0900686, MR/K02325X/1, MR/K006312/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  20. ESRC [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  21. MRC [MR/K006312/1, MR/K023187/1, G0900686] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Lifestyle interventions delivered during the retirement transition might promote healthier ageing. We report a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a web-based platform (Living, Eating, Activity and Planning through retirement; LEAP) promoting healthy eating (based on a Mediterranean diet (MD)), physical activity (PA) and meaningful social roles. Methods A single blinded, two-arm RCT with individual allocation. Seventy-five adult regular internet users living in Northeast England, within two years of retirement, were recruited via employers and randomised in a 2: 1 ratio to receive LEAP or a 'usual care' control. Intervention arm participants were provided with a pedometer to encourage self-monitoring of PA goals.Feasibility of the trial design and procedures was established by estimating recruitment and retention rates, and of LEAP from usage data. At baseline and 8-week follow-up, adherence to a MD derived from three 24-hour dietary recalls and seven-day PA by accelerometry were assessed. Healthy ageing outcomes (including measures of physiological function, physical capability, cognition, psychological and social wellbeing) were assessed and acceptability established by compliance with measurement protocols and completion rates. Thematically analysed, semi-structured, qualitative interviews assessed acceptability of the intervention, trial design, procedures and outcome measures. Results Seventy participants completed the trial; 48 (96%) participants in the intervention and 22 (88%) in the control arm. Participants had considerable scope for improvement in diet as assessed by MD score. LEAP was visited a median of 11 times (range 1-80) for a mean total time of 2.5 hours (range 5.5 min-8.3 hours). 'Moving more', 'eating well' and 'being social' were the most visited modules. At interview, participants reported that diet and PA modules were important and acceptable within the context of healthy ageing. Participants found both trial procedures and outcome assessments acceptable. Conclusions The trial procedures and the LEAP intervention proved feasible and acceptable. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of LEAP to promote healthy lifestyles warrant evaluation in a definitive RCT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available