4.6 Article

Comparative Study on the Transcriptome of Maize Mature Embryos from Two China Elite Hybrids Zhengdan958 and Anyu5

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158028

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471566]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zhengdan958 and Anyu5 are two elite maize hybrids of China, which manifest similar paternal lines (Chang7-2) but different maternal lines (Zheng58 and Ye478). Zhengdan958 has a 10-15% yield advantage over Anyu5. In this study, we applied digital gene expression technology to analyze transcriptomes of mature embryos from the two hybrids and their parents, aimed to investigate molecular mechanism of heterosis and genetic effects of maternal lines. Results showed that 71.66% and 49.70% of differentially expressed genes exhibited non-additive expression in Zhengdan958 and Anyu5, respectively. The number of non-additive genes involved in abiotic and biotic stress responses in Zhengdan958 was higher than that in Anyu5, which was in agreement with their phenotypic performance. Furthermore, common over-dominance and under-dominance genes (137 and 162, respectively) between the two hybrids focused on plant development and abiotic stress response. Zhengdan958 contained 97 maternal expression-level dominance (maternal-ELD) genes, and the number was higher than that of Anyu5 (45). Common up-regulated maternal-ELD genes were significantly enriched in meristem and shoot development while common down-regulated maternal-ELD genes were involved in pyruvate metabolic process, negative regulation of catalytic activity and response to stress. Therefore, non-additive genes mainly contribute to heterosis in Zhengdan958, including many genes for plant development, abiotic and biotic stress responses. Maternal effects may play important roles in maize heterosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available