4.6 Review

The Prognostic Value of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152500

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Doctor Innovation funding of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine [BXJ201213]
  2. National Natural funding of China [81202087, 81202088, 81172520]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [12ZR144640, 14411950200, 14411950201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The prognostic values of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and TILs subsets in breast cancer (BC) are uncertain. Methods A systematic literature search (MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to August 2014) was conducted for studies which met the eligibility criteria. The primary clinical outcome was defined as disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and BC-specific survival (BCSS). Random or fixed-effects model was adopted to estimate the summary hazard ratio (HR). Results Twenty-five published studies comprising 22,964 patients were reviewed. Pooled analysis indicated that TILs were not prognostic markers for DFS and OS in overall population, but related to improved DFS (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.88) and OS (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.710.87) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. For TILs subsets, CD8+ lymphocytes were associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.84) and BCSS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86) in overall population, while FOXP3+ lymphocytes were associated with reduced DFS (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.01-2.05) and OS (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.15-1.97). In estrogen receptor (ER) negative patients, CD8(+) lymphocytes was also related to better BCSS. In addition, the high density of CD20(+), CD3(+) or low level of PD-1+ or gamma delta T lymphocytes indicated increased OS in limited studies. Conclusion TILs and TILs subsets are promising prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer, especially in TNBC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available