4.5 Article

The reference values for semen parameters of 1213 fertile men in Guangdong Province in China

Journal

ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 298-303

Publisher

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.143251

Keywords

Chinese fertile men; semen parameters; semen quality; time-to-pregnancy

Funding

  1. Program of S and T (Guangdong) Project [2010B031600174, 2011B031900001]
  2. Program of Guangdong Province Family Planning Commission [2012101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Semen samples were collected from 1213 fertile men whose partners had a time-to-pregnancy (TTP) <= 12 months in Guangdong Province in Southern China, and semen parameters including semen volume, sperm concentration, total counts, motility, and morphology were evaluated according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 guideline. All semen parameters analyzed were normal in similar to 62.2% of the total samples, whereas similar to 37.8% showed at least one of the semen parameters below normal threshold values. The fifth centiles (with 95% confidence intervals) were 1.3 (1.2-1.5) ml for semen volume, 20 x 10(6) (18x10(6) - 20x10(6)) ml(-1) for sperm concentration, 40 x 10(6) (38x10(6) - 44x10(6)) per ejaculate for total sperm counts, 48% (47%-53%) for vitality, 39% (36%-43%) for total motility, 25% (23%-27%) for sperm progressive motility, 5.0% (4%-5%) for normal morphology. The pH values ranged from 7.2 to 8.0 with the mean standard deviation at 7.32 +/- 0.17. No effects of age and body mass index were found on semen parameters. Occupation, smoking and alcohol abuse, varicocele appeared to decrease semen quality. Sperm concentration, but not sperm morphology, is positively correlated with TTP, whereas vitality is negatively correlated with TTP. Our study provides the latest reference values for the semen parameters of Chinese fertile men in Guangdong Province, which are close to those described in the new WHO guidelines (5th Edition).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available