4.6 Article

Generation and Characterization of Novel Magnetic Field-Responsive Biomaterials

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133878

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness - FEDER funds, EU [FIS2013-41821-R]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias. Instituto de Salud Carlos III - FEDER funds, EU) [FIS PI14/0955, FIS PI14/1343, PI11/01582]
  3. Junta de Andalucia, Spain (Consejeria de Innovacion, Ciencia y Empleo-Proyectos de Excelencia) [P10-CTS-6060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the preparation of novel magnetic field-responsive tissue substitutes based on biocompatible multi-domain magnetic particles dispersed in a fibrin-agarose biopolymer scaffold. We characterized our biomaterials with several experimental techniques. First we analyzed their microstructure and found that it was strongly affected by the presence of magnetic particles, especially when a magnetic field was applied at the start of polymer gelation. In these samples we observed parallel stripes consisting of closely packed fibers, separated by more isotropic net-like spaces. We then studied the viability of oral mucosa fibroblasts in the magnetic scaffolds and found no significant differences compared to positive control samples. Finally, we analyzed the magnetic and mechanical properties of the tissue substitutes. Differences in microstructural patterns of the tissue substitutes correlated with their macroscopic mechanical properties. We also found that the mechanical properties of our magnetic tissue substitutes could be reversibly tuned by noncontact magnetic forces. This unique advantage with respect to other biomaterials could be used to match the mechanical properties of the tissue substitutes to those of potential target tissues in tissue engineering applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available