4.6 Article

IL-4Rα-Dependent Alternative Activation of Macrophages Is Not Decisive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pathology and Bacterial Burden in Mice

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121070

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. International Centre for Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology (ICGEB)
  2. Cape Town Component with Arturo Falaschi
  3. Claude Leon Foundation
  4. CIDRI
  5. Wellcome trust [084323]
  6. South African Medical Research Council
  7. ICGEB Arturo Falaschi PhD Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Classical activation of macrophages (caMph or M1) is crucial for host protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection. Evidence suggests that IL-4/IL-13 alternatively activated macrophages (aaMph or M2) are exploited by Mtb to divert microbicidal functions of caMph. To define the functions of M2 macrophages during tuberculosis (TB), we infected mice deficient for IL-4 receptor alpha on macrophages (LysM(cre)IL-4R alpha(-/lox)) with Mtb. We show that absence of IL-4R alpha on macrophages does not play a major role during infection with Mtb H37Rv, or the clinical Beijing strain HN878. This was demonstrated by similar mortality, bacterial burden, histopathology and T cell proliferation between infected wild-type (WT) and LysM(cre)IL-4R alpha(-/lox) mice. Interestingly, we observed no differences in the lung expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and Arginase 1 (Arg1), well-established markers for M1/M2 macrophages among the Mtb-infected groups. Kinetic expression studies of IL-4/IL-13 activated bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) infected with HN878, followed by gene set enrichment analysis, revealed that the MyD88 and IL-6, IL-10, G-CSF pathways are significantly enriched, but not the IL-4R alpha driven pathway. Together, these results suggest that IL-4R alpha-macrophages do not play a central role in TB disease progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available