4.6 Article

Population Genomic Analysis of 962 Whole Genome Sequences of Humans Reveals Natural Selection in Non-Coding Regions

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121644

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI [N01-HC-85239, N01-HC-85079, N01-HC-85086, N01-HC-35129, N01 HC-15103, N01 HC-55222, N01-HC-45133, HHSN268201200036C, HL080295, HL08762, HL105756 N01-HC-2519552]
  2. [HHSN268201100005C]
  3. [HHSN268201100006C]
  4. [HHSN268201100009C]
  5. [HHSN268201100008C]
  6. [HHSN268201100007C]
  7. [HHSN268201100010C]
  8. [HHSN268201100011C]
  9. [HHSN268201100012C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whole genome analysis in large samples from a single population is needed to provide adequate power to assess relative strengths of natural selection across different functional components of the genome. In this study, we analyzed next-generation sequencing data from 962 European Americans, and found that as expected approximately 60% of the top 1% of positive selection signals lie in intergenic regions, 33% in intronic regions, and slightly over 1% in coding regions. Several detailed functional annotation categories in intergenic regions showed statistically significant enrichment in positively selected loci when compared to the null distribution of the genomic span of ENCODE categories. There was a significant enrichment of purifying selection signals detected in enhancers, transcription factor binding sites, microRNAs and target sites, but not on lincRNA or piRNAs, suggesting different evolutionary constraints for these domains. Loci in repressed or low activity regions and loci near or overlapping the transcription start site were the most significantly over-represented annotations among the top 1% of signals for positive selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available