4.4 Article

Assessment of drought hazard, vulnerability, and risk: A case study for administrative districts in South Korea

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDRO-ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 28-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jher.2013.07.003

Keywords

Drought; Hazard; Risk; Vulnerability

Funding

  1. Natural Hazard Mitigation Research Group [NEMA-NH-2011-40]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0028564]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [21A20132012107] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a methodology for assessing drought hazard, vulnerability, and risk, using hydro-meteorological and socio-economic data. Though drought is a common natural disaster in South Korea, very little attention has been so far paid to preparedness of drought disaster, especially to spatial assessment of drought risk. A data-based framework for drought hazard and vulnerability was proposed in this study using a drought risk concept presented by the National Drought Mitigation Centre, USA. To quantify drought risk, Drought Hazard Index (DHI) was proposed based on the occurrence probability of drought from precipitation-based index and Drought Vulnerability Index (DVI) was proposed to reflect 7 socio-economic consequences of drought. The framework presented herein emphasizes the combined role of hazard and vulnerability in assessing drought risk and utilizes hydro-meteorological and socio-economic data to map the drought risk for 229 administrative districts across South Korea. The overall results demonstrate the effectiveness of the framework for the understanding of potential risk of drought in South Korea. (C) 2013 International Association for Hydro-environment Engineering and Research, Asia Pacific Division. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available