Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Improving the reporting and interpretation of clinical trial outcomes
Robert Froud et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE (2012)
Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied minimally important change values
Henrica C. W. de Vet et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Estimating the number needed to treat from continuous outcomes in randomised controlled trials: methodological challenges and worked example using data from the UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation (BEAM) trial
Robert Froud et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2009)
Choice of external criteria in back pain research: Does it matter? Recommendations based on analysis of responsiveness
Henrik H. Lauridsen et al.
PAIN (2007)
Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach
Henrica C. W. de Vet et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2007)
Clinically important outcomes in low back pain
RWJG Ostelo et al.
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY (2005)
Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain -: Part I:: Validation
U Müller et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2004)
On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation
CB Terwee et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2003)
Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale
JT Farrar et al.
PAIN (2001)
Share Paper
