4.6 Article

HbA1C Variability and the Risk of Renal Status Progression in Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115509

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Project of National Nature Science Foundation of China [81270824]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Project [11DZ1921904, 11410708500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To explore the association between glycated hemoglobin (A1C) variability and renal disease progression in patients with diabetes mellitus. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed using the PubMed and Embase databases (up to April 26, 2014). The hazard ratio (HR) was pooled per unit increase in the standard deviation of A1C (A1C-SD) to evaluate the dose-response relationship between A1C-SD and the risk of nephropathy. Results: Eight studies with a total of 17,758 subjects provided the HR for A1C-SD and were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled HR results demonstrated that A1C-SD was significantly associated with the progression of renal status (HR for both T1DM and T2DM 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-1.64; HR for T1DM 1.70, 95% CI 1.41-2.05; HR for T2DM 1.20, 95% CI 1.12-1.28). A1C-SD was significantly correlated with new-onset microalbuminuria (HR for T1DM 1.63, 95% CI 1.28-2.07; HR for T2DM 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.39). These outcomes were also supported in subgroup analyses. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the results were robust. Conclusions: A1C variability is independently associated with the development of microalbuminuria and the progression of renal status in both type 1 and 2 diabetes patients. A standard method for measuring A1C variability is essential for further and deeper analyses. In addition, future studies should assess the effect of reducing A1C variability on nephropathy complication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available