4.4 Article

Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Increased Arterial Stiffness in Patients With Primary Sjogren's Syndrome

Journal

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages 554-562

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/acr.22493

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo compare the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis measured by means of pulse wave velocity (PWV) in women with primary Sjogren's syndrome (SS) versus a healthy age- and sex-matched control group, and to identify factors independently associated with PWV in primary SS. MethodsForty-four women with primary SS and 78 age-matched healthy women without overt cardiovascular (CV) diseases were assessed for traditional and nontraditional CV risk factors. PWV was also performed. A linear regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with PWV in primary SS. ResultsWomen with primary SS had significantly higher PWV than controls (P = 0.030), and the frequency of increased PWV was significantly higher in this group (25% versus 8%; P = 0.013). The proportion of patients ages 50 years (ratio 4.6) with increased PWV was almost 2-fold higher than those ages >50 years (ratio 2.4) with respect to controls. Positivity for anti-SSB was more frequent in patients with normal PWV than in those with increased PWV (61% versus 18%; P = 0.034). Women with primary SS and increased PWV had lower levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D; P = 0.047) than primary SS patients with normal PWV. In addition, 25(OH)D levels tended to correlate inversely with PWV in women with primary SS (P = 0.067), but not in controls (P = 0.97). In multivariate analysis, the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Sjogren's Syndrome Damage Index emerged as factors independently correlated with PWV. ConclusionWomen with primary SS had higher PWV than controls, but a similar FRS. The FRS and chronic damage were found to be independently associated with PWV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available