4.6 Article

Response of the Hepatic Transcriptome to Aflatoxin B1 in Domestic Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo)

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100930

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USDA-AFRI from the USDA NIFA Animal Genome Program [2007-35205-17880, 2009-35205-05302, 2013-01043]
  2. NIFA [2009-35205-05302, 582572] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dietary exposure to aflatoxin B-1 (AFB(1)) is detrimental to avian health and leads to major economic losses for the poultry industry. AFB(1) is especially hepatotoxic in domestic turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo), since these birds are unable to detoxify AFB(1) by glutathione-conjugation. The impacts of AFB(1) on the turkey hepatic transcriptome and the potential protection from pretreatment with a Lactobacillus-based probiotic mixture were investigated through RNA-sequencing. Animals were divided into four treatment groups and RNA was subsequently recovered from liver samples. Four pooled RNA-seq libraries were sequenced to produce over 322 M reads totaling 13.8 Gb of sequence. Approximately 170,000 predicted transcripts were de novo assembled, of which 803 had significant differential expression in at least one pair-wise comparison between treatment groups. Functional analysis linked many of the transcripts significantly affected by AFB(1) exposure to cancer, apoptosis, the cell cycle or lipid regulation. Most notable were transcripts from the genes encoding E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Mdm2, osteopontin, S-adenosylmethionine synthase isoform type-2, and lipoprotein lipase. Expression was modulated by the probiotics, but treatment did not completely mitigate the effects of AFB(1). Genes identified through transcriptome analysis provide candidates for further study of AFB(1) toxicity and targets for efforts to improve the health of domestic turkeys exposed to AFB(1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available