4.6 Article

Loss of Gq11 Genes Does Not Abolish Melanopsin Phototransduction

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098356

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01EY019053, GM076430]
  2. Open Access Promotion Fund of the Johns Hopkins University Libraries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In mammals, a subset of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) expresses the photopigment melanopsin, which renders them intrinsically photosensitive (ipRGCs). These ipRGCs mediate various non-image-forming visual functions such as circadian photoentrainment and the pupillary light reflex (PLR). Melanopsin phototransduction begins with activation of a heterotrimeric G protein of unknown identity. Several studies of melanopsin phototransduction have implicated a G-protein of the G(q/11) family, which consists of Gna11, Gna14, Gnaq and Gna15, in melanopsin-evoked depolarization. However, the exact identity of the G(q/11) gene involved in this process has remained elusive. Additionally, whether G(q/11) G-proteins are necessary for melanopsin phototransduction in vivo has not yet been examined. We show here that the majority of ipRGCs express both Gna11 and Gna14, but neither Gnaq nor Gna15. Animals lacking the melanopsin protein have well-characterized deficits in the PLR and circadian behaviors, and we therefore examined these non-imaging forming visual functions in a variety of single and double mutants for G(q/11) family members. All G(q/11) mutant animals exhibited PLR and circadian behaviors indistinguishable from WT. In addition, we show persistence of ipRGC light-evoked responses in Gna11(-/-); Gna14(-/-) retinas using multielectrode array recordings. These results demonstrate that G(q), G(11), G(14), or G(15) alone or in combination are not necessary for melanopsin-based phototransduction, and suggest that ipRGCs may be able to utilize a G(q/11)-independent phototransduction cascade in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available