4.6 Article

Insights from Computational Modeling in Inflammation and Acute Rejection in Limb Transplantation

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099926

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Armed Forces Institute for Advanced Regenerative Medicine Program (TATRC, DOD) Program, Department of Defense [WX81XWH-07-1-0415]
  2. Austrian Research Fund (Erwin Schrodinger Stipendium)
  3. Austrian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
  4. Pennsylvania Department of Health Commonwealth Universal Research Enhancement (CURE) program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute skin rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is the major obstacle for wider adoption in clinical practice. This study utilized computational modeling to identify biomarkers for diagnosis and targets for treatment of skin rejection. Protein levels of 14 inflammatory mediators in skin and muscle biopsies from syngeneic grafts [n = 10], allogeneic transplants without immunosuppression [n = 10] and allografts treated with tacrolimus [n = 10] were assessed by multiplexed analysis technology. Hierarchical Clustering Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Random Forest Classification and Multinomial Logistic Regression models were used to segregate experimental groups. Based on Random Forest Classification, Multinomial Logistic Regression and Hierarchical Clustering Analysis models, IL-4, TNF-alpha and IL-12p70 were the best predictors of skin rejection and identified rejection well in advance of histopathological alterations. TNF-alpha and IL-12p70 were the best predictors of muscle rejection and also preceded histopathological alterations. Principal Component Analysis identified IL-1 alpha, IL-18, IL-1 beta, and IL-4 as principal drivers of transplant rejection. Thus, inflammatory patterns associated with rejection are specific for the individual tissue and may be superior for early detection and targeted treatment of rejection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available