4.6 Review

Blinded by PRISMA: Are Systematic Reviewers Focusing on PRISMA and Ignoring Other Guidelines?

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics

Padhraig S. Fleming et al.

ANGLE ORTHODONTIST (2013)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Penny F. Whiting et al.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2011)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review

Brian H. Willis et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2011)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Kenneth F. Schulz et al.

BMC MEDICINE (2010)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

David Moher et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2009)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

Mariska M. G. Leeflang et al.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2008)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Bias and causal associations in observational research

DA Grimes et al.

LANCET (2002)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting

DF Stroup et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2000)