4.6 Article

Mutation or Loss of p53 Differentially Modifies TGFβ Action in Ovarian Cancer

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089553

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Liz Tilberis Ovarian Cancer Research Fund [L/T/UIC/0.1.2011]
  2. Vahlteich Award from the UIC College of Pharmacy
  3. American Cancer Society Research Scholar Illinois Division [RSG-12-230-01-TBG]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological disease affecting women in the US. The Cancer Genome Atlas Network identified p53 mutations in 96% of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas, demonstrating its critical role. Additionally, the Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF beta) pathway is dysfunctional in various malignancies, including ovarian cancer. This study investigated how expression of wild-type, mutant, or the absence of p53 alters ovarian cancer cell response to TGF beta signaling, as well as the response of the ovarian surface epithelium and the fallopian tube epithelium to TGF beta. Only ovarian cancer cells expressing wild-type p53 were growth inhibited by TGF beta, while ovarian cancer cells that were mutant or null p53 were not. TGF beta induced migration in p53 null SKOV3 cells, which was not observed in SKOV3 cells with stable expression of mutant p53 R273H. Knockdown of wild-type p53 in the OVCA 420 ovarian cancer cells enhanced cell migration in response to TGF beta. Increased protein expression of DKK1 and TMEPAI, two pro-invasive genes with enhanced expression in late stage metastatic ovarian cancer, was observed in p53 knockdown and null cells, while cells stably expressing mutant p53 demonstrated lower DKK1 and TMEPAI induction. Expression of mutant p53 or loss of p53 permit continued proliferation of ovarian cancer cell lines in the presence of TGF beta; however, cells expressing mutant p53 exhibit reduced migration and decreased protein levels of DKK1 and TMEPAI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available