4.6 Article

Best Practices and Joint Calling of the HumanExome BeadChip: The CHARGE Consortium

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068095

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Building on GWAS for NHLBI-diseases
  2. U.S. CHARGE consortium through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) [5RC2HL102419]
  3. NIH [N01-AG-12100]
  4. NIA Intramural Research Program
  5. Icelandic Heart Association
  6. Icelandic Parliament
  7. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [HHSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100006C, HHSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN2682011000010C, HHSN2682011000011C, HHSN2682011000012C]
  8. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL41993, HL091244, N01-HC-95095, N01-HC-48047, N01-HC-48048, N01-HC-48049, N01-HC-48050, N01-HC-45134, N01-HC-05187, N01-HC-45205, N01-HC-45204, U01 HL56563, U01 HL56564, U01 HL56565]
  9. University of Washington Clinical Nutrition Research Unit [DK-35816]
  10. Medic One Foundation, Seattle, WA
  11. NHLBI [N01-HC-85239, N01-HC-85079, N01-HC-85080, N01-HC-85081, N01-HC-85082, N01-HC-85083, N01-HC-85084, N01-HC-85085]
  12. NIA [AG-023629, AG-15928, AG-20098, AG-027058, N01AG62101, N01AG62103, N01AG62106, 1R01AG032098-01A1]
  13. National Center of Advancing Translational Technologies CTSI [UL1TR000124]
  14. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK063491]
  15. Cedars-Sinai Board of Governors' Chair in Medical Genetics (JIR)
  16. Erasmus Medical Center and Erasmus University, Rotterdam
  17. Netherlands Organization for the Health Research and Development (ZonMw)
  18. Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE)
  19. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
  20. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sports
  21. European Commission (DG XII)
  22. Municipality of Rotterdam
  23. Illumina, Inc.
  24. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute on Aging
  25. National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  26. [U01-HG-004729]
  27. [R01-HL-084099]
  28. [N01-HC-25195]
  29. [N01-HC-95159]
  30. [N01-HC-95160]
  31. [N01-HC-95161]
  32. [N01-HC-95162]
  33. [N01-HC-95163]
  34. [N01-HC-95164]
  35. [N01-HC-95165]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genotyping arrays are a cost effective approach when typing previously-identified genetic polymorphisms in large numbers of samples. One limitation of genotyping arrays with rare variants (e.g., minor allele frequency [MAF] < 0.01) is the difficulty that automated clustering algorithms have to accurately detect and assign genotype calls. Combining intensity data from large numbers of samples may increase the ability to accurately call the genotypes of rare variants. Approximately 62,000 ethnically diverse samples from eleven Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium cohorts were genotyped with the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip across seven genotyping centers. The raw data files for the samples were assembled into a single project for joint calling. To assess the quality of the joint calling, concordance of genotypes in a subset of individuals having both exome chip and exome sequence data was analyzed. After exclusion of low performing SNPs on the exome chip and non-overlap of SNPs derived from sequence data, genotypes of 185,119 variants (11,356 were monomorphic) were compared in 530 individuals that had whole exome sequence data. A total of 98,113,070 pairs of genotypes were tested and 99.77% were concordant, 0.14% had missing data, and 0.09% were discordant. We report that joint calling allows the ability to accurately genotype rare variation using array technology when large sample sizes are available and best practices are followed. The cluster file from this experiment is available at www.chargeconsortium.com/main/exomechip.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available