Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals
Mikael Fogelholm et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2012)
Comparison of intraclass correlation coefficient estimates and standard errors between using cross-sectional and repeated measurement data: The Safety Check cluster randomized trial
Edward H. Ip et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2011)
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Meeting for Peer Review at A Resort That's Virtually Free
John Bohannon
SCIENCE (2011)
Statistical analysis of the National Institutes of Health peer review system
Valen E. Johnson
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2008)
Reviewing peer review
Bruce Alberts et al.
SCIENCE (2008)
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications - Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability
Herbert W. Marsh et al.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2008)
Virtual teams: Effects of technological mediation on team performance
JE Driskell et al.
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE (2003)
A multilevel cross-classified modelling approach to peer review of grant proposals: the effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings
UW Jayasinghe et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2003)
Share Paper
