4.6 Article

Accelerating Bayesian Hierarchical Clustering of Time Series Data with a Randomised Algorithm

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059795

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/F027400/1, EP/I036575/1]
  2. MRC Biostatistics Fellowship
  3. Warwick MOAC Doctoral Training Centre
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F027400/1, EP/I036575/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [G0902104] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/F027400/1, EP/I036575/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. MRC [G0902104] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We live in an era of abundant data. This has necessitated the development of new and innovative statistical algorithms to get the most from experimental data. For example, faster algorithms make practical the analysis of larger genomic data sets, allowing us to extend the utility of cutting-edge statistical methods. We present a randomised algorithm that accelerates the clustering of time series data using the Bayesian Hierarchical Clustering (BHC) statistical method. BHC is a general method for clustering any discretely sampled time series data. In this paper we focus on a particular application to microarray gene expression data. We define and analyse the randomised algorithm, before presenting results on both synthetic and real biological data sets. We show that the randomised algorithm leads to substantial gains in speed with minimal loss in clustering quality. The randomised time series BHC algorithm is available as part of the R package BHC, which is available for download from Bioconductor (version 2.10 and above) via http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.10/bioc/html/BHC. html. We have also made available a set of R scripts which can be used to reproduce the analyses carried out in this paper. These are available from the following URL. https://sites.google. com/site/randomisedbhc/.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available