4.5 Article

Meta-Analyses of Factors Associated with Leptospirosis in Domestic Dogs

Journal

ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 328-336

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/zph.12236

Keywords

Leptospirosis; domestic dogs; risk factors; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. CONICYT, Chile

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Factors related with leptospirosis in domestic dogs have been reported worldwide. The aims of this study were to identify factors associated with this disease described in different observational studies and to combine the coinciding factors in at least four studies using meta-analyses, to obtain a pooled odds ratio (OR) as measure of infection risk. A literature search was performed in electronic databases, electronic databases of specific journals and search engines to find studies published in English, Spanish and Portuguese available from January 1960 to January 2015. Two hundred and eighteen factors were identified in 31 publications including cross-sectional and case-control studies. Finally, independent meta-analyses were performed with six different variables, which included between 4 and 8 articles. The pooled OR indicated that the variables mixed-breed dogs', flooding occurrence in the habitat of the dog' and working dogs' were risk factors for leptospirosis, while being a dog less than 1year old' was a protective factor; however, all these associations were not statistically significant. Otherwise, the variables male dog' and urban dog' were statistically significant risk factors for infection. This study highlights the need for more formal studies on the epidemiology of canine leptospirosis. Nevertheless, the study revealed that some risk factors for infection coincided in different observational studies. These factors could be considered to raise suspicion about the disease, especially when there is a history of exposure to the bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available