4.5 Article

Main radiation events in Pan-Octodontoidea (Rodentia, Caviomorpha)

Journal

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 175, Issue 3, Pages 587-606

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12288

Keywords

Argentina; diversification event; Eocene; Miocene; Oligocene; phylogeny; SALMA

Categories

Funding

  1. [UNLP N11-674]
  2. [PICT 2012-1483]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Caviomorphs (South American hystricognaths) are recorded in the continent since the middle Eocene. The middle Eocene-early Oligocene is considered a key moment for their evolutionary history because by the early Oligocene they were differentiated into four superfamilies: Octodontoidea, Cavioidea, Chinchilloidea and Erethizontoidea. Due to their generalized dental patterns and abundance in the fossil record, Octodontoidea are interesting for analysing the origin and early history of caviomorphs. The phylogenetic relationships of the earliest octodontoids are studied herein. Results confirmed a basal caviomorph diversification in the middle Eocene (c. 45 Mya), with one lineage leading to Pan-Octodontoidea, and another leading to Erethizontoidea, Cavioidea and Chinchilloidea, which is not in accordance with analyses based on molecular data. Three major radiations were identified: the first one (late Eocene?/early Oligocene?) occurred in low latitudes with the differentiation of Pan-Octodontoidea and the earliest crown-Octodontoidea. The second radiation (late Oligocene) was a large-scale South American event; in the southernmost part of the continent it is recognized as the first Patagonian octodontoid radiation, which provided the characteristic high morphological disparity of the superfamily. The third radiation (late Miocene) is characterized by the replacement of old' by modern' octodontoids; the nature of this third event needs to be study in a broader taxonomic context. (c) 2015 The Linnean Society of London.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available