4.6 Article

The ACTN3 R577X Polymorphism across Three Groups of Elite Male European Athletes

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043132

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Consejo Superior de Deportes [001/UPR10/12]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [RYC-2010-05957]
  3. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [PS09/00194]
  4. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [404166334]
  5. Ministry of Sport, Tourism and Youth Policy of the Russian Federation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ACTN3 R577X polymorphism (rs1815739) is a strong candidate to influence elite athletic performance. Yet, controversy exists in the literature owing to between-studies differences in the ethnic background and sample size of the cohorts, the latter being usually low, which makes comparisons difficult. In this case: control genetic study we determined the association between elite athletic status and the ACTN3 R577X polymorphism within three cohorts of European Caucasian men, i.e. Spanish, Polish and Russian [ 633 cases (278 elite endurance and 355 power athletes), and 808 non-athletic controls]. The odds ratio (OR) of a power athlete harbouring the XX versus the RR genotype compared with sedentary controls was 0.54 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34-0.48; P = 0.006]. We also observed that the OR of an endurance athlete having the XX versus the RR genotype compared with power athletes was 1.88 (95% CI: 1.07-3.31; P = 0.028). In endurance athletes, the OR of a world-class competitor having the XX genotype versus the RR+RX genotype was 3.74 (95% CI: 1.08-12.94; P = 0.038) compared with those of a lower (national) competition level. No association (P>0.1) was noted between the ACTN3 R577X polymorphism and competition level (world-class versus national-level) in power athletes. Our data provide comprehensive support for the influence of the ACTN3 R577X polymorphism on elite athletic performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available