4.6 Article

Chlamydia trachomatis Incidence and Re-Infection among Young Women - Behavioural and Microbiological Characteristics

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037778

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Health and Ageing, Commonwealth of Australia, as part of a National Chlamydia Pilot program
  2. National Health and Research Council in Australia [509144]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This study aimed to estimate rates of chlamydia incidence and re-infection and to investigate the dynamics of chlamydia organism load in prevalent, incident and re-infections among young Australian women. Methods: 1,116 women aged 16 to 25 years were recruited from primary care clinics in Australia. Vaginal swabs were collected at 3 to 6 month intervals for chlamydia testing. Chlamydia organism load was measured by quantitative PCR. Results: There were 47 incident cases of chlamydia diagnosed and 1,056.34 person years of follow up with a rate of 4.4 per 100 person years (95% CI: 3.3, 5.9). Incident infection was associated with being aged 16 to 20 years [RR = 3.7 (95% CI: 1.9, 7.1)], being employed [RR = 2.4 (95% CI: 1.1, 4.9)] and having two or more new sex partners [RR = 5.5 (95% CI: 2.6, 11.7)]. Recent antibiotic use was associated with a reduced incidence [RR: 0.1 (95% CI: 0.0, 0.5)]. There were 14 re-infections with a rate of 22.3 per 100 person years (95% CI: 13.2, 37.6). The median time to re-infection was 4.6 months. Organism load was higher for prevalent than incident infections (p<0.01) and for prevalent than re-infections (p<0.01). Conclusions: Chlamydia is common among young women and a high proportion of women are re-infected within a short period of time, highlighting the need for effective partner treatment and repeat testing. The difference in organism load between prevalent and incident infections suggests prevalent infection may be more important for ongoing transmission of chlamydia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available