4.6 Article

Deficiency of C-C Chemokine Receptor 5 Suppresses Tumor Development via Inactivation of NF-κB and Upregulation of IL-1Ra in Melanoma Model

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033747

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Research Foundation [MRC 9440, R13-2010-002948]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the relevance of C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) expression and tumor development, we compared melanoma growth in CCR5 knockout (CCR5(-/-)) mice and wild type (CCR5(+/+)) mice. CCR5(-/-) mice showed reduced tumor volume, tumor weight, and increased survival rate when compared to CCR5(+/+) mice. We investigated the activation of NF-kappa B since it is an implicated transcription factor in the regulation of genes involving cell growth, apoptosis, and tumor growth. Significant inhibition of DNA binding activity of NF-kappa B, and translocation of p50 and p65 into the nucleus through the inhibition of phosphorylation of I kappa B was found in the melanoma tissues of CCR5(-/-) mice compared to melanoma tissues of CCR5(+/+) mice. NF-kappa B target apoptotic protein expression, such as cleaved caspase-3, cleaved PARP, and Bax, was elevated, whereas the survival protein expression levels, such as Bcl-2, C-IAP1, was decreased in the melanoma tissues of CCR5(-/-) mice. Interestingly, we found that the level of IL-1Ra, a tumor growth suppressive cytokine, was significantly elevated in tumor tissue and spleen of CCR5(-/-) mice compared to the level in CCR5(+/+) mice. Moreover, infiltration of CD8(+) cytotoxic T cell and CD57(+) natural killer cells was significantly increased in melanoma tumor and spleen tissue of CCR5(-/-) mice compared to that of CCR5(+/+) mice. Therefore, these results showed that CCR5 deficiency caused apoptotic cell death of melanoma through inhibition of NF-kappa B and upregulation of IL-1Ra.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available