Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Longitudinal Trends in the Performance of Scientific Peer Reviewers
Michael Callaham et al.
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE (2011)
Enhanced quality and transparency of health research reporting can lead to improvements in public health policy decision-making: help from the EQUATOR Network
Gilberto Kac et al.
CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA (2011)
The international EQUATOR network: enhancing the quality and transparency of health care research
Nikolaos Pandis et al.
Journal of Applied Oral Science (2011)
Results of a longitudinal study of rigorous manuscript submission guidelines designed to improve the quality of clinical research reporting in a peer-reviewed surgical journal
Kathryn E. Wynne et al.
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY (2011)
To publish or perish: How to review a manuscript
J.C. Winck et al.
Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (2011)
Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study
Bruno R. da Costa et al.
BMJ OPEN (2011)
Reporting Guidelines for Survey Research: An Analysis of Published Guidance and Reporting Practices
Carol Bennett et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2011)
Adoption of CONSORT Statements for Randomized Control Trials Published in the Journal of Pediatric Nursing
Cecily L. Betz
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES (2011)
Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial
E. Cobo et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
Iveta Simera et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2010)
Changing expectations Do journals drive methodological changes? Should they?
Hollis N. Erb
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE (2010)
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Kenneth F. Schulz et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2010)
PEER REVIEWER TRAINING AND EDITOR SUPPORT: RESULTS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEY OF NURSING PEER REVIEWERS
Margaret Comerford Freda et al.
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING (2009)
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
Iain Chalmers et al.
LANCET (2009)
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
David Moher et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2009)
Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments
Isabelle Boutron et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2008)
The EQUATOR Network: promoting the transparent and accurate reporting of research
Chris Morris
DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY (2008)
CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts
Sally Hopewell et al.
LANCET (2008)
A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials
Stephanie L. Prady et al.
PLOS ONE (2008)
Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project
F. Davidoff et al.
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE (2008)
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
Sally Hopewell et al.
TRIALS (2008)
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
Allison Tong et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE (2007)
The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2007)
Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial
Erik Cobo et al.
PLOS ONE (2007)
The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality
Michael L. Callaham et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2007)
Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey
Leanne Tite et al.
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH (2007)
The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement - Has it improved?
N. Smidt et al.
NEUROLOGY (2006)
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
R Smith
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE (2006)
Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement
DC Des Jarlais et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2004)
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative
PM Bossuyt et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2003)
Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines
K Malterud
LANCET (2001)
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
D Moher et al.
LANCET (2001)
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting
DF Stroup et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2000)
Share Paper
