Journal
ZEMDIRBYSTE-AGRICULTURE
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages 51-58Publisher
LITHUANIAN RESEARCH CENTRE AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY
DOI: 10.13080/z-a.2015.102.006
Keywords
extreme learning machine; nitrogen; partial least squares; spectroscopy; wavelength selection
Categories
Funding
- Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [61233006]
- National Key Technology Research and Development Program of Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2014BAD08B03]
- Scientific Innovation Research of College Graduate in Jiangsu Province [CXZZ13_0690]
- Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Measuring the nitrogen content of plants is useful for nitrogen fertilizer management. The aim of this work is to explore the use of spectroscopy for estimating lettuce leaf nitrogen content. Leaf reflectance spectra were measured using a spectroradiometer with a range of 350-2500 nm, and 160 fresh lettuce leaves given five different nitrogen treatments were used for spectra acquisition and total nitrogen determination. Interval partial least squares (iPLS), synergy interval partial least squares (siPLS), and siPLS combined with genetic algorithms (GA-siPLS) were used to select the optimal intervals or variables. Partial least squares (PLS) and extreme learning machine (ELM) methods were used to develop calibration models. One characteristic wavelength region (470-590 nm) using 120 variables was selected by iPLS; four characteristic wavelength regions (440-530, 530-620, 620-710 and 890-980 nm) using 362 variables were selected by siPLS, and 56 wavelength variables were selected by GA-siPLS. Six different regression models were established for nitrogen content by PLS and ELM based on optimal intervals or variables. The results imply that GA-siPLS is an efficient variable selection algorithm and ELM is a successful nonlinear regression tool. Furthermore, GA-siPLS combined with ELM is a feasible method for measuring nitrogen content in lettuce, as it performed better than other models. The optimal results achieved a root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) = 0.2890% and correlation coefficient Rp = 0.9218.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available