4.6 Article

MicroRNA Expression Characterizes Oligometastasis(es)

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028650

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research
  2. Center for Radiation Therapy
  3. Chicago Tumor Institute
  4. Dr. Lloyd Old, Mr. and Mrs. Vincent Foglia and the Foglia foundation
  5. Lung Cancer Research Foundation
  6. Cancer Research Foundation
  7. NIH [K22 LM008308-04, 5UL1RR024999-04]
  8. University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center [5P30CA014599-35]
  9. National Center for the Multi Scale Analysis of Genomic and Cellular Networks (MAGNeT) [5U54CA121852-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cancer staging and treatment presumes a division into localized or metastatic disease. We proposed an intermediate state defined by <= 5 cumulative metastasis(es), termed oligometastases. In contrast to widespread polymetastases, oligometastatic patients may benefit from metastasis-directed local treatments. However, many patients who initially present with oligometastases progress to polymetastases. Predictors of progression could improve patient selection for metastasis-directed therapy. Methods: Here, we identified patterns of microRNA expression of tumor samples from oligometastatic patients treated with high-dose radiotherapy. Results: Patients who failed to develop polymetastases are characterized by unique prioritized features of a microRNA classifier that includes the microRNA-200 family. We created an oligometastatic-polymetastatic xenograft model in which the patient-derived microRNAs discriminated between the two metastatic outcomes. MicroRNA-200c enhancement in an oligometastatic cell line resulted in polymetastatic progression. Conclusions: These results demonstrate a biological basis for oligometastases and a potential for using microRNA expression to identify patients most likely to remain oligometastatic after metastasis-directed treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available