4.6 Article

Differential Requirement for Cathepsin D for Processing of the Full Length and C-Terminal Fragment of the Malaria Antigen MSP1

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024886

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council under the Selective Chemical Intervention in Biological Systems initiative [BB/D005469/1]
  2. Medical Research Council, United Kingdom [U117584248]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D005469/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G9721629, G0900950, G9721629B, MC_U117584248, G0900950B] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/D005469/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [G9721629, G0900950, MC_U117584248] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Merozoite Surface Protein 1 is expressed on the surface of malaria merozoites and is important for invasion of the malaria parasite into erythrocytes. MSP1-specific CD4 T cell responses and antibody can confer protective immunity in experimental models of malaria. In this study we explore the contributions of cathepsins D and E, two aspartic proteinases previously implicated in antigen processing, to generating MSP1 CD4 T-cell epitopes for presentation. The absence of cathepsin D, a late endosome/lysosomal enzyme, is associated with a reduced presentation of MSP1 both following in vitro processing of the epitope MSP1 from infected erythrocytes by bone marrow-derived dendritic cells, and following in vivo processing by splenic CD11c+ dendritic cells. By contrast, processing and presentation of the soluble recombinant protein fragment of MSP1 is unaffected by the absence of cathepsin D, but is inhibited when both cathepsin D and E are absent. The role of different proteinases in generating the CD4 T cell repertoire, therefore, depends on the context in which an antigen is introduced to the immune system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available