4.6 Article

AP-2δ Is a Crucial Transcriptional Regulator of the Posterior Midbrain

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023483

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ap-2 transcription factors comprise a family of 5 closely related sequence-specific DNA binding proteins that play pivotal and non-redundant roles in embryonic organogenesis. To investigate the function of Ap-2 delta, w delta e analyzed its expression during embryogenesis and generated Ap-2 delta-deficient mice. In line with the specific expression pattern of Ap-2 delta in the mesencephalic tectum and the dorsal midbrain, Ap-2 delta-deficient mice failed to maintain the colliculus inferior, a derivative of the dorsal midbrain, as a consequence of increased apoptotic cell death. To identify specific Ap-2 delta target genes in cells of the developing dorsal midbrain, we performed whole genome analysis of cDNA expression levels. This approach identified a set of 12 putative target genes being expressed in the developing midbrain, including the transcription factors Pitx2, Mef2c, Bhlhb4 and Pou4f3. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation (CHIP) we showed that some of these genes are direct targets of Ap-2 delta. Consistently, we demonstrate that Ap-2 delta d occupies and activates the Pou4f3 and Bhlhb4 promoters. In addition, known Pou4f3 target genes were downregulated in the posterior midbrain of Ap-2 delta-deficient mice. Despite the absence of a central part of the auditory pathway, the presence of neuronal responses to sounds in the neocortex of Ap-2 delta-deficient mice indicates that auditory information from the brainstem still reaches the neocortex. In summary, our data define Ap-2 delta as an important transcription factor, specifying gene expression patterns required for the development of the posterior midbrain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available