4.6 Article

Uracil DNA N-Glycosylase Promotes Assembly of Human Centromere Protein A

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017151

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI [5R01CA058320-15]
  2. NIH [5F32GM069297]
  3. California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)
  4. Don Cleveland in the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  5. UCSD Neuroscience Microscopy Shared Facility [P30 NS047101]
  6. UCSD Cancer Center Specialized Support [P30 CA23100]
  7. Research Council of Norway
  8. National Programme for Research in Functional Genomics in Norway (FUGE)
  9. Norwegian Cancer Association
  10. Cancer Fund at St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim
  11. Svanhild
  12. Arne Must Fund for Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uracil is removed from DNA by the conserved enzyme Uracil DNA N-glycosylase (UNG). Previously, we observed that inhibiting UNG in Xenopus egg extracts blocked assembly of CENP-A, a histone H3 variant. CENP-A is an essential protein in all species, since it is required for chromosome segregation during mitosis. Thus, the implication of UNG in CENP-A assembly implies that UNG would also be essential, but UNG mutants lacking catalytic activity are viable in all species. In this paper, we present evidence that UNG2 colocalizes with CENP-A and H2AX phosphorylation at centromeres in normally cycling cells. Reduction of UNG2 in human cells blocks CENP-A assembly, and results in reduced cell proliferation, associated with increased frequencies of mitotic abnormalities and rapid cell death. Overexpression of UNG2 induces high levels of CENP-A assembly in human cells. Using a multiphoton laser approach, we demonstrate that UNG2 is rapidly recruited to sites of DNA damage. Taken together, our data are consistent with a model in which the N-terminus of UNG2 interacts with the active site of the enzyme and with chromatin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available