Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.From black box to white box at open access journals: predictive validity of manuscript reviewing and editorial decisions at Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Lutz Bornmann et al.
RESEARCH EVALUATION (2010)
Reliability of reviewers' ratings when using public peer review: a case study
L. Bornmann et al.
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2010)
The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews
Lutz Bornmann et al.
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2009)
Reviewer and editor biases in journal peer review: an investigation of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Lutz Bornmann et al.
RESEARCH EVALUATION (2009)
Response to Whittaker: challenges in testing for gender bias
Amber E. Budden et al.
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2008)
How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study
Lutz Bornmann et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2008)
A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors
Frederick P. Rivara et al.
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS (2007)
Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature
Iain D. Craig et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2007)
Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study
Elizabeth Wager et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2006)
Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors
S Schroter et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2006)
Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance
U Pöschl
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2004)
A multilevel cross-classified modelling approach to peer review of grant proposals: the effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings
UW Jayasinghe et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2003)
The nonuse of psychological research at two federal agencies
HR Arkes
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2003)
Peer review in the funding of research in higher education: The Australian experience
UW Jayasinghe et al.
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS (2001)
Share Paper
