4.6 Article

Microstructural Abnormalities in Subcortical Reward Circuitry of Subjects with Major Depressive Disorder

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 5, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013945

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDA, Bethesda, MD [R01 14118, R21 026104, P20 026002]
  2. Office of National Drug Control Policy - Counterdrug Technology Assessment Center (ONDCP-CTAC), Washington, [DABK39-03-C-0098]
  3. NINDS [R01 NS052368]
  4. NCRR [P41RR14075]
  5. Mental Illness and Neuroscience Discovery (MIND) Institute
  6. MGH Department of Radiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Previous studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) have focused on abnormalities in the prefrontal cortex and medial temporal regions. There has been little investigation in MDD of midbrain and subcortical regions central to reward/aversion function, such as the ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra (VTA/SN), and medial forebrain bundle (MFB). Methodology/Principal Findings: We investigated the microstructural integrity of this circuitry using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in 22 MDD subjects and compared them with 22 matched healthy control subjects. Fractional anisotropy (FA) values were increased in the right VT and reduced in dorsolateral prefrontal white matter in MDD subjects. Follow-up analysis suggested two distinct subgroups of MDD patients, which exhibited non-overlapping abnormalities in reward/aversion circuitry. The MDD subgroup with abnormal FA values in VT exhibited significantly greater trait anxiety than the subgroup with normal FA values in VT, but the subgroups did not differ in levels of anhedonia, sadness, or overall depression severity. Conclusions/Significance: These findings suggest that MDD may be associated with abnormal microstructure in brain reward/aversion regions, and that there may be at least two subtypes of microstructural abnormalities which each impact core symptoms of depression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available