4.6 Article

Selective Estrogen Receptor Down-Regulator and Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators Differentially Regulate Lactotroph Proliferation

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010060

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA096613, CA096613] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES012212, P30 ES006096, ES012212, P30-ES06096] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We recently reported that estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha), even in absence of estrogen (E2), plays a critical role in lactotroph homeostasis. The anti-estrogen ICI 182780 ( ICI), but not tamoxifen or raloxifene, rapidly promoted the degradation of ER alpha, and inhibited cell proliferation. However, all three ER antagonists suppressed PRL release, suggesting that receptor occupation is sufficient to inhibit prl gene expression whereas receptor degradation is required to suppress lactotroph proliferation. In this study our objective was to determine whether ER alpha degradation versus occupation, differentially modulates the biological outcome of anti-estrogens. Principal Findings: Using the rat lactotroph cell line, GH3 cells, we report that ICI induced proteosome mediated degradation of ER alpha. In contrast, an ER alpha specific antagonist, MPP, that does not promote degradation of ER alpha, did not inhibit cell proliferation. Further, ICI, but not MPP, abolished anchorage independent growth of GH3 cells. Yet, both ICI and MPP were equally effective in suppressing prl expression and release, as well as ERE-mediated transcriptional activity. Conclusion: Taken together, our results demonstrate that in lactotrophs, ER alpha degradation results in decreased cell proliferation, whereas ER alpha occupation by an antagonist that does not promote degradation of ER alpha is sufficient to inhibit prl expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available