4.6 Article

Reduction of Dopamine Level Enhances the Attractiveness of Male Drosophila to Other Males

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004574

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [30270341, 30630028, 30621004]
  2. Multidisciplinary Research Program (Brain and Mind) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. Major State Basic Research Program [G20000 77800, 2006CB806600, 2006CB911003]
  4. Precedent Project of Important Intersectional Disciplines in the Knowledge Innovation Engineering Department of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJCX1-09-03, KSCX2-YW-R-28]
  5. CNRS
  6. Burgundy Regional Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dopamine is an important neuromodulator in animals and its roles in mammalian sexual behavior are extensively studied. Drosophila as a useful model system is widely used in many fields of biological studies. It has been reported that dopamine reduction can affect female receptivity in Drosophila and leave male-female courtship behavior unaffected. Here, we used genetic and pharmacological approaches to decrease the dopamine level in dopaminergic cells in Drosophila, and investigated the consequence of this manipulation on male homosexual courtship behavior. We find that reduction of dopamine level can induce Drosophila male-male courtship behavior, and that this behavior is mainly due to the increased male attractiveness or decreased aversiveness towards other males, but not to their enhanced propensity to court other males. Chemical signal input probably plays a crucial role in the male-male courtship induced by the courtees with reduction of dopamine. Our finding provides insight into the relationship between the dopamine reduction and male-male courtship behavior, and hints dopamine level is important for controlling Drosophila courtship behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available