4.6 Article

Reducing AD-Like Pathology in 3xTg-AD Mouse Model by DNA Epitope Vaccine - A Novel Immunotherapeutic Strategy

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002124

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [AG20241, NS50895, NS057395, AG00538, AG00096, P50 AG16573]
  2. Alzheimers Association [IIRG036279, IIRG0728314]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The development of a safe and effective AD vaccine requires a delicate balance between providing an adequate anti-A beta antibody response sufficient to provide therapeutic benefit, while eliminating an adverse T cell-mediated proinflammatory autoimmune response. To achieve this goal we have designed a prototype chemokine-based DNA epitope vaccine expressing a fusion protein that consists of 3 copies of the self-B cell epitope of A beta(42) (A beta(1-11)), a non-self T helper cell epitope (PADRE), and macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC/CCL22) as a molecular adjuvant to promote a strong anti-inflammatory Th2 phenotype. Methods and Findings: We generated pMDC-3A beta(1-11)-PADRE construct and immunized 3xTg-AD mouse model starting at age of 3-4 months old. We demonstrated that prophylactic immunizations with the DNA epitope vaccine generated a robust Th2 immune response that induced high titers of anti-A beta antibody, which in turn inhibited accumulation of A beta pathology in the brains of older mice. Importantly, vaccination reduced glial activation and prevented the development of behavioral deficits in aged animals without increasing the incidence of microhemorrhages. Conclusions: Data from this transitional pre-clinical study suggest that our DNA epitope vaccine could be used as a safe and effective strategy for AD therapy. Future safety and immunology studies in large animals with the goal to achieve effective humoral immunity without adverse effects should help to translate this study to human clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available