4.6 Article

Antihypertensive Drug Guanabenz Is Active In Vivo against both Yeast and Mammalian Prions

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001981

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GIS Infections a prion
  2. ACI Jeune Chercheur from the French government
  3. CRITT Sante Bretagne
  4. Ministere de la Recherche
  5. FRM
  6. CNRS [Ingenieur de valorisation fellowship]
  7. ANR blanche from the French government
  8. INSERM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Prion-based diseases are incurable transmissible neurodegenerative disorders affecting animals and humans. Methodology/Principal Findings: Here we report the discovery of the in vivo antiprion activity of Guanabenz (GA), an agonist of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors routinely used in human medicine as an antihypertensive drug. We isolated GA in a screen for drugs active in vivo against two different yeast prions using a previously described yeast-based two steps assay. GA was then shown to promote ovine PrPSc clearance in a cell-based assay. These effects are very specific as evidenced by the lack of activity of some GA analogues that we generated. GA antiprion activity does not involve its agonist activity on alpha 2-adrenergic receptors as other chemically close anti-hypertensive agents possessing related mechanism of action were found inactive against prions. Finally, GA showed activity in a transgenic mouse-based in vivo assay for ovine prion propagation, prolonging slightly but significantly the survival of treated animals. Conclusion/Significance: GA thus adds to the short list of compounds active in vivo in animal models for the treatment of prion-based diseases. Because it has been administrated for many years to treat hypertension on a daily basis, without major side-effects, our results suggest that it could be evaluated in human as a potential treatment for prion-based diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available