4.5 Article

Growth-promoting action and growth factor release by different platelet derivatives

Journal

PLATELETS
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 252-256

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/09537104.2013.809060

Keywords

Cytokine; endothelial cell; fibroblast; growth factor

Funding

  1. European Community [201681]
  2. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD)
  3. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC)
  4. Ministero dell'Universita e della Ricerca Scientifica

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Platelet derivatives are commonly used in wound healing and tissue regeneration. Different procedures of platelet preparation may differentially affect growth factor release and cell growth. Preparation of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is accompanied by release of growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor 131 (TGFIES1), and several cytokines. When compared with the standard procedure for platelet-rich plasma (PRP), PRF released 2-fold less PDGF, but >15-fold and >2-fold VEGF and TGF beta 1, respectively. Also, the release of several cytokines (IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN gamma, MIP-1 alpha, MIP-10 and TNF alpha) was significantly increased in PRF-conditioned medium (CM), compared to PRP-CM. Incubation of both human skin fibroblasts and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) with PRF-derived membrane (mPRF) or with PRF-CM enhanced cell proliferation by >2-fold (p<0.05). Interestingly, PRP elicited fibroblast growth at a higher extent compared to PRF. At variance, PRF effect on HUVEC growth was significantly greater than that of PRP, consistent with a higher concentration of VEGF in the PRF-CM. Thus, the procedure of PRP preparation leads to a larger release of PDGF, as a possible result of platelet degranulation, while PRF enhances the release of proangiogenic factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available