Journal
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages 177-185Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c49580
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Nuts-Ohra Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: The authors conducted a review of the recent literature on the monitoring of free flaps to create an overview of the current monitoring devices and their potential as an ideal monitoring method. Methods: A literature-based study was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane databases. The following search terms were used: flap and monitoring. All monitoring methods found between January of 1999 and January of 2009 were evaluated. Monitoring methods that were described in five or more clinical reports were further investigated. Results: The advantages and disadvantages of conventional monitoring methods, the implantable Doppler system, color duplex sonography, near-infrared spectroscopy, microdialysis, and laser Doppler flowmetry are presented. Furthermore, an overview is given of their potential as ideal monitoring method. Conclusions: The implantable Doppler system, near-infrared spectroscopy, and laser Doppler flowmetry appear to be the best monitoring devices currently available. As most of the publications on monitoring have focused on the reliability of the systems, future research should also address their cost efficiency. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 125: 177, 2010.)
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available