4.4 Review

A review of an ultrafast and sensitive bioassay platform technology: Microwave-accelerated metal-enhanced fluorescence

Journal

PLASMONICS
Volume 3, Issue 2-3, Pages 89-101

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11468-008-9059-x

Keywords

metal-enhanced fluorescence; plasmon-enhanced fluorescence; surface-enhanced fluorescence; plasmonics; radiative decay engineering; plasmonics; electric field enhancement; silver island films; focused microwaves; microwave-accelerated metal-enhanced fluorescence ultrafast kinetics; immunoassays

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the publication of our first paper on the microwave-accelerated metal-enhanced fluorescence (MAMEF) bioassay platform technology in 2005 (Aslan and Geddes, Anal Chem 77:8057-8067, 2005), we have been repeatedly asked to comment on the advantages of microwave heating with plasmonic nanostructures over conventional heating for bioassays by many of our colleagues in the community. We note that one can find a couple of review articles, one by Mingos (Gabriel et al., Chem Soc Rev 27:213-223, 1998) and another by Thostenson and Chou (Manufacturing 30:1055-1071, 1999), summarizing the fundamentals and several applications of microwave processing of chemical compounds and composite materials, respectively. These review articles also present a direct comparison of microwave heating with conventional heating with respect to the processing of materials and microwave-assisted synthesis of chemical compounds. In this review article, we seek to remind the reader of the fundamentals of microwave heating and the interactions of microwaves with chemical and biological materials relevant to our recent work on bioassays, rather than repeating the information provided in the above-mentioned very informative reviews. We also summarize our work on MAMEF-based bioassays where we use plasmonic nanostructures to additionally plasmon-enhance fluorescence signatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available