4.5 Article

Plasma-Induced Death of HepG2 Cancer Cells: Intracellular Effects of Reactive Species

Journal

PLASMA PROCESSES AND POLYMERS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 59-66

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ppap.201100031

Keywords

atmospheric-pressure plasmas; cancer cell treatment; cell death; intracellular effects; reactive species

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [10875048, 51077063]
  2. Ministry of Education, People's Republic of China
  3. Genetically Modified New Varieties of Plant and Animal of Major Projects of China [2009ZX08016-001A]
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology, People's Republic of China [2009DFB20290]
  5. State Bureau of Oceanic Administration, People's Republic of China [201005013]
  6. CSIRO
  7. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reports show that cold atmospheric-pressure plasmas can induce death of cancer cells in several minutes. However, very little is presently known about the mechanism of the plasma-induced death of cancer cells. In this paper, an atmospheric-pressure plasma plume is used to treat HepG2 cells. The experimental results show that the plasma can effectively control the intracellular concentrations of ROS, NO and lipid peroxide. It is shown that these concentrations are directly related to the mechanism of the HepG2 death, which involves several stages. First, the plasma generates NO species, which increases the NO concentration in the extracellular medium. Second, the intracellular NO concentration is increased due to the NO diffusion from the medium. Third, an increase in the intracellular NO concentration leads to the increase of the intracellular ROS concentration. Fourth, the increased oxidative stress results in more effective lipid peroxidation and consequently, cell injury. The combined action of NO, ROS and lipid peroxide species eventually results in the HepG2 cell death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available