4.5 Review

Early repeated ureteroscopy within 6-8 weeks after a primary endoscopic treatment in patients with upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma: preliminary findings

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 9, Pages 1201-1206

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1753-7

Keywords

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma; Conservative treatment; Flexible ureteroscopy; Second look

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the cancer detection rate (CDR) of an early repeated flexible ureteroscopy (2nd-look-URS) and its impact on the conservative management of patients affected with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Clinical and surgical data from 41 patients with UTUC who underwent 2nd-look-URS within 60 days of their first URS with concomitant laser tumour photoablation at a single tertiary care referral centre from 2009 to 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Radical nephroureterectomy was offered during follow-up in case of massive tumour recurrence (defined as a tumour not completely removable only with a conservative approach). Descriptive statistics tested the impact of 2nd-look-URS outcomes on subsequent endoscopic evaluation. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed massive tumour recurrence-free survival (mRFS) rates according to the presence of a tumour at 2nd-look-URS. Cox regression analyses identified predictors of mRFS. CDR at 2nd-look-URS was 51.2 %. CDRs at third URS were 81.3 and 41.2 % in patients with a positive and a negative 2nd-look-URS, respectively (p = 0.02). At a mean (median) follow-up of 34.6 (27.6) months, mRFS rates were 88 and 48 % in patients with negative and positive 2nd-look-URS, respectively (log rank = 0.015). Tumour grade at first URS and 2nd-look-URS outcomes achieved predictor status for mRFS (HR 6.1, 95 % CI 1.42-26.27 and HR 5.39, 95 % CI 1.18-24.66, respectively, all p aecurrency sign 0.03). 2nd-look-URS-related CDR in conservatively treated UTUC patients was 51.2 %. 2nd-look-URS outcomes affected the findings of both subsequent endoscopic evaluation and mRFS. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of this approach in terms of patient outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available