4.5 Article

Prognostic Significance of Muscle Attenuation in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 39, Issue 12, Pages 2975-2982

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3205-3

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Nara Medical University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emerging evidences have gradually revealed the skeletal muscle attenuation (MA) was not only reflected the accumulation of lipids in skeletal muscle but also associated with physiological and pathological states. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of MA on the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). Eighty-three patients with pancreatic cancer who received NACRT were enrolled. Patients were divided according to their Hounsfield units of the skeletal muscle at the third lumbar vertebra in CT. The lower quartile was defined as MA group and the remainder as control group. There was no significant difference in overall survival between pre-NACRT MA and control groups. In contrast, patients with post-NACRT MA had a significantly poorer prognosis than patients without. The patients in the post-NACRT MA group were significantly older than patients in the control group. There were no significant differences in most clinicopathological and perioperative factors between both groups. However, patients with post-NACRT MA had a longer hospital stay than patients without. Furthermore, the incompletion rate of the proposed adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly higher in the MA group than control. Importantly, multivariate analysis indicated that post-NACRT MA was an independent prognostic factor. Muscle attenuation may have a significant impact in pancreatic cancer patients treated with multimodal therapy. Therefore, our data may provide new insights into perioperative patient care to improve the prognosis of resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available