4.5 Article

Transcriptome Analysis of Taxus cuspidata Needles Based on 454 Pyrosequencing

Journal

PLANTA MEDICA
Volume 77, Issue 4, Pages 394-400

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1250331

Keywords

transcriptome analysis; Taxus cuspidata; Taxaceae; 454 pyrosequencing; Taxol biosynthesis; transcription factor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30873459]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Taxus species are highly valued as renewable resources for the production of Taxol. Despite the commercial and medicinal importance of Taxus, little genomic information is available for yew species, and Taxol biosynthesis still needs to be fully elucidated. In this study, 454 pyrosequencing technology was employed to produce an expressed sequence tag (EST) from the needles of Taxus cuspidata. In all, 81148 high-quality reads from the needles of T. cuspidata were produced using Roche GS FLX Titanium. A total of 20557 unique sequences were obtained, including 12975 singletons and 7582 contigs. Approximately 14095 unique sequences were annotated by a similarity search against five public databases. Gene ontology revealed 11220 unique sequences that could be assigned to 45 vocabularies. In the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes mapping, 2403 transcripts were established as associated with 3821 biochemical pathways. Enzymes in the plastidial 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate pathway were well represented. Candidates of the putative genes of Taxol biosynthesis were revealed, including those in the remaining steps. In total, 291 transcripts were identified, representing putative homologues of transcription factors. Furthermore, 753 simple sequence repeat motifs, which are potential molecular markers for genetic application, were identified. These results provide the largest EST collections in Taxus and will contribute to biosynthetic and biochemical studies that lead to drug improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available